Despegue ← Catamarca OPPORTUNITY
11 more opportunitiesOther opportunities ▾
ESEN Where my company can get in
Catamarca · Puna above 4,000 meters · isolated generation, diesel and conversion to hybrid
The spending runs today, but the customer itself published its plan to shrink itthesis

Isolated power in Catamarca's puna: operating and maintaining the diesel plants and converting them to hybrid

Estimated entry range for a supplier
~USD 0.35 M/yr
Estimated market: USD 2.5-4.9 M/yr
up to date · reviewed Sep 14, 2026
estim Aug 30, 2026midpoint ~USD 3.7 M/yrurgent demandour reading
At a glance
Who buys
The operator, under an availability contract with penalties
the 3 doors →
In which projects
Agua Rica / MARA, Fénix, Hombre Muerto Oeste and 1 more
what each one invests →
When
We found no tender called for any of the high-voltage lines announced toward the Catamarca puna, so this spend runs every single day, with no cut-off date. The day one of them is called, diesel starts having an expiry date. thesis
what to watch and where it stands →
The main barrier
It is not capital and it is not the equipment: it is having spares and people up on the salar when the road closes. The power plant belongs to the mine and no operator publishes who runs it; what can be sold is what the operator lacks: availability. thesis
the whole entry map →
Where you get in
The gap is not in the equipment —the brand supplies that— but in the service nobody provides from within the province: operating the plant, supplying it with diesel and storing energy. And there is a fourth route, with a different buyer: the two parks still to be built.
the 4 routes →

Energy is 30 % of the operating cost of a brine lithium mine: in Sal de Vida's technical report it is USD 943 per tonne of carbonate, the second-largest expense after reagents and above all of labor verif Sal de Vida technical report, operating cost table. In Catamarca, two of the four operations still run on diesel above 4,000 meters of altitude, and how a third is powered today is not published. Fénix already left, with a dedicated 135-kilometer gas pipeline verif Salta's state energy company and diesel only as backup verif Rio Tinto annual report 2025, and Tres Quebradas will have grid power at its Fiambalá plant once the 132 kV line from Tinogasta is finished, expected for December 2026 prob El Ancasti with the provincial government's announcement. That makes this market far smaller than it looks, and its shape can flip: Sal de Vida's 2022 technical report set the goal of 30 % of its first stage's energy coming from the sun verif 2022 technical report, and Rio Tinto's 2025 annual report puts it off until later verif Rio Tinto annual report 2025. In Catamarca's puna we did not identify any installed batteries in operation unconf; the builder of Tres Quebradas' electrical system describes a photovoltaic park with more than 7 MW of storage for the salar and Fiambalá, contracted in 2022 prob the contractor's website.

This niche's window opens and closes at the same time, and that is what has to be read correctly. It opens because two operations burn diesel every single day and none of the three announced high-voltage lines has a meter built.

See the clocks that are running, one by one
It closes because the buyer itself says out loud that it wants out of diesel: Sal de Vida's technical report plans a 6 MW diesel plant that would run in hybrid mode with a solar plant, with the goal of 30 % of its first stage's energy coming from the sun, although Rio Tinto's 2025 annual report already puts that off until later and describes diesel generation, with gas and solar «considered at a later time». Anyone entering to sell diesel arrives late; anyone entering to operate today's plant and convert it later arrives exactly on time.

verif primary sourceestim our own calculationthesis our readingHow to read all five →

What the market is made of

This niche's split is harsh and worth seeing before investing: most of the energy bill is not contractable. The diesel molecule is bought from the oil company and the equipment is controlled by the brand. What is left —and it is all this figure counts— is operating and maintaining what is already installed, and then converting it.

How it splits, and against which total
Split over the midpoint TAM of ~USD 3.7 M/yr. Own estimate. Diesel (around USD 13 M/yr) is not in this pie: it is not a supplier market. estim
CaptiveUSD 1.4 M · 34%
Addressable (SAM)USD 2.3 M · 57%
Realistic wedge for an entrantUSD 0.3 M · 9%
CaptiveUSD 1.4 M34%non-addressable
the imported equipment, original spares and warranty service controlled by the manufacturer, plus the fuel supply contract with the oil company
Addressable (SAM)USD 2.3 M57%addressable
operating and maintaining the plants on site —which the reference technical report itself excludes in writing from its energy cost— plus the fuel farm with consumption telemetry and the engineering of the conversion to hybrid
Realistic wedge for an entrantUSD 0.3 M9%addressable
the maintenance retainer for a single plant, with a base in the area and spares in stock: it is the cheapest door because it does not require buying the equipment and the customer already has the problem
Non-addressable

The equipment and original spares —gensets, turbines, switchboards and their warranty service— which the manufacturer controls and which are also imported. Plus the supply of the diesel molecule, which is a contract with the oil company.

Addressable share

Operating and maintaining the existing plants, the on-site fuel farm with its consumption telemetry, and the engineering and construction of the conversion to hybrid with batteries.

Entry range for a supplier

The maintenance contract for a single plant, with a base in the area and spares in stock. It is the cheapest door: it does not require buying the equipment, it is billed as a retainer and the customer already has the problem.

▸ Nobody publishes the installed self-generation capacity of the private plants, so the figure is built from cost per tonne rather than from MW. And the capex of the conversion to hybrid is not quantified: the only published precedent gives a per-MW unit cost, and Sal de Vida's report does not say how many MW its solar plant would have.

Who really pays?

There are three payers and they differ from one another — different purchasing process, different timeline and different collection risk:

If you sellThe operation and maintenance retainer for a mine's power plant
→
The operator, under an availability contract with penalties thesis

It is the highest-margin contract in the field because what is sold is not a repair: it is that the plant does not stop thesis. Sal de Vida's power plant feeds the ponds, the process plant and the water wells verif: if it goes down, it does not cost a day, it costs a process window thesis. No operator publishes who runs that plant today unconf.

If you sellThe engineering, construction and later maintenance of the conversion to solar with batteries
→
The operator, as a capital project thesis

Sal de Vida's 2022 technical report set the goal of 30 % of its first stage's energy coming from an on-site solar plant, and made clear that this investment is not included in its costs or its economic evaluation verif; Rio Tinto's 2025 annual report already describes diesel generation, with gas and solar for later on verif. The reference case is Lindero, in Salta: solar panels and batteries that, according to the company and the Salta government, cut fuel use by an estimated 40 % prob prob; the annual saving in dollars is not published unconf.

If you sellThe hybrid parks and the grid for the puna's towns
→
The Salar del Hombre Muerto mining trust, which tenders through the provincial distributor thesis

This payer is not the mine and almost nobody looks at it thesis. The El Peñón hybrid solar park was tendered by the provincial distribution company in 2019 with around USD 1.5 M from the Salar del Hombre Muerto trust —funded with contributions from the Fénix operator—, requiring bidders to be local companies, and it was awarded to a contractor prob prob. The same trust paid for the Antofagasta de la Sierra park, and the 2019 provincial plan added two more, in Antofalla and La Ciénaga prob, which we did not find built unconf. It tenders rather than takes quotes: the process is public procurement prob.

▸
All three doors share one requirement the provincial registry does not grant: being able to have people and spares up there when the weather closes the road. Between 21 and 23 July 2026 the puna sat at 27 degrees below zero with winds above 170 km/h, provincial route 43 became impassable and 23 people had to be rescued prob. An availability contract is won or lost there.

Which projects move this demand

Tres Quebradas stage 2: plant and infrastructure for 40,000 t/year of lithium carbonate via direct extraction (DLE)…

see the project →

Lithium brine project in the Salar del Hombre Muerto (western zone), to produce 12,000 t/yr of lithium carbonate equivalent…

see the project →
USD 251 M Apr 6, 2026 ↗

Expansion (Phase 1B) of the historic Fénix lithium-carbonate project in the Salar del Hombre Muerto, operated by Rio Tinto via Minera del Altiplano…

see the project →
USD 6,394 M Oct 27, 2026 ↗

Catamarca's largest copper project and the largest capital investment in the province. MARA integrates the Agua Rica deposit (Andalgalá)…

see the project →

When the window opens

The grid reaches the puna one job at a time and with different destinations: supplying the towns is one thing, supplying a lithium plant is another. The 500 kV Chaparro – Antofagasta de la Sierra – La Puna line appears on the list of priority works since May 2025 and still has no tender called. The one that is moving is a different one, and they should not be confused: a medium-voltage line that will integrate the Puna into the provincial power system (Villa Vil, Barranca Larga, Laguna Blanca, El Peñón and Antofagasta de la Sierra), with its continuation contracted in March 2026 and completion expected in the second half of 2027. ⚠️ For that work we found no award act published, no tender documents, no amount and no contractor, and the official release does not say whom it supplies. These four numbers tell you which of the two is happening.

What to watchWhat changes when it happensStatus
The tender call for the 500 kV line to Antofagasta de la Sierra
It is the only fact that puts an expiry date on selling power at the site at mine scale. While there is no call, there is no clock.
a priority work, named on the official list verif official annex of the plan, with the regime defined and no tender called.
See the evidence
The only call we found under the concession regime is the one for the Buenos Aires metropolitan area, published on 12 August 2026 with bids opening at 120 days; that there is no other is not confirmed against a complete list unconf
verif Aug 12, 2026 ↗
The provincial electricity works reaching the puna villages
It switches off the public half of the business —the villages and the parks paid for by the mining trust— and not necessarily the mine's: they are two different buyers and it is best not to mix them.
continuation contracted according to the announcement of 25 March 2026, with 17 kilometres already inaugurated between Villa Vil and Barranca Larga and completion due in the second half of 2027.
See the evidence
⚠️ The provincial statement headlines «33 kV» and in the body says «33 KVA», which is not the same magnitude: the voltage is not confirmed, and neither does the award act appear
prob Mar 25, 2026 ↗
The operations still generating with diesel
It is the whole denominator of the number. Today it is two out of four, and there is no data for a third; each one that moves to the grid or to gas cuts the market in direct proportion.
two out of four generate on site, and there is no data for a third. Sal de Vida Stage 1, with diesel verif Rio Tinto annual report 2025, and Hombre Muerto Oeste, with diesel gensets according to its feasibility study verif Galan feasibility study, October 2023 and a generator plant and a solar park authorized in its environmental impact statement of January 2025 prob press reproducing the provincial announcement.
See the evidence
Fénix runs on gas through a dedicated pipeline verif Salta's state energy company, with backup diesel verif Rio Tinto annual report 2025. Tres Quebradas will have grid power at its Fiambalá plant once the 132 kV line from Tinogasta is finished, expected for December 2026 prob El Ancasti with the provincial government's announcement; how it is powered today is not published unconf, and the builder of its electrical system describes a photovoltaic park with more than 7 MW of storage for the salar and Fiambalá, contracted in 2022 prob the contractor's website
prob Feb 19, 2026 ↗
The price of diesel delivered at the site
It is the big term in the subtraction that yields the number —USD 702 of the 943— and it is also the saving offered to the client when moving to solar with batteries. If diesel falls, the case for conversion shrinks and the contractable layer weighs relatively more.
there is no public series for bulk diesel at a mine site: the USD 0.854 per litre this page uses is our own assumption and it is declared.
See the evidence
The official series that does exist is the pump price per service station, and ⚠️ for Catamarca it lags —the whole province's latest declaration is from 19 August 2026 and the only station in Tinogasta last declared in July 2025—, so it does not serve as a current price for this calculation
unconf Sep 14, 2026
What signals the game has changed
The high-voltage line, the structural brake, announced three times over

There are three routes announced toward the puna and none with a tender called. (1) The private line that Central Puerto and YPF Luz agreed to study and develop in January 2025: their own press release speaks of some 140 kilometers extendable to 350 and of USD 250 to 400 million verif the companies' press release, and it gives no voltage, no capacity and no date.

See the evidence
(2) Genneia's high-voltage line in Salta, for USD 400 M, announced prob press, 6-Feb-2025 and with no act unconf. (3) The 500 kV Chaparro – Antofagasta de la Sierra – La Puna line, which appears on the official list of urgent and priority works verif national electricity transmission works plan and which since December 2025 is tendered as a public works concession — but the only call we found under that regime is the one for the Buenos Aires metropolitan area, whose text does not name the puna line verif Resolución 202/2026; that there is no other is not confirmed against a complete list of calls unconf. And that line starts at Chaparro, which only has 500 kV if another job on the same list is built. When one of them turns from announcement into act, the business of selling power at the site starts to have an exit date.
The buyer says out loud that it wants to buy less of this

The buyer itself published it: Sal de Vida's 2022 technical report set the goal of 30 % of its first stage's energy coming from its own solar plant, and Rio Tinto's 2025 annual report puts it off until later: diesel now, gas and solar «considered at a later time».

See the evidence
A niche whose customer publishes its plan to shrink it reads differently: the contract worth fighting for is not selling fuel, it is executing the conversion and operating whatever remains.
The Vicuñas pipeline would change the equipment, not just the supplier

TGN's project adds up to more than 300 km of 12-inch pipe, an expected initial demand of 1.5 million cubic meters and an investment of USD 370 M, according to its general manager in October 2024 prob press, on a route from Susques to Antofagasta de la Sierra.

See the evidence
If it gets built, converting diesel generation to gas in the puna stops being hypothetical — and anyone who specialized in diesel engines needs to have changed their offering beforehand.
The base has already shrunk on its own once, and it can happen again

Of Catamarca's four lithium operations, one left diesel before this niche existed: Fénix, with a dedicated 135 km gas pipeline verif Salta's state energy company and diesel only as backup verif Rio Tinto annual report 2025.

See the evidence
Tres Quebradas has the 132 kV line between Tinogasta and Fiambalá under construction, which will be able to power its plant and is due to be finished in December 2026 prob El Ancasti with the provincial government's announcement; how it is powered today is not published unconf. Kachi could be next: its supply study with YPF Luz has already concluded that the grid is viable. Every exit shrinks the market without anyone competing for it.
See the remaining 2 risks
The headline figure depends on two ramp-ups that have not finished yet

Sal de Vida achieved first production in the second quarter of 2026 and is still in commissioning verif Rio Tinto production report for the second quarter of 2026.

See the evidence
Hombre Muerto Oeste processed its first chloride in the quarter ended 30 June 2026. If either delays its ramp-up, the bottom of the band is what applies. The indicator that says so is public: the production each operator declares in its quarterly report.
Nobody publishes the installed self-generation capacity of the private plants

The province's research declares it as a gap: the self-generation capacity in MW of Fénix and Sal de Oro could not be confirmed. That is why this figure is built from the cost per tonne of product rather than from installed MW, which would be the natural route. If that capacity were published, the method could be redone from the other side and cross-checked.

The opportunity in depth

How to get inthe gap and the routes that open it
1

Operating and maintaining the plant, which is what the technical report itself leaves out of its figure. The reference energy cost is built as fuel plus depreciation of the equipment over seven years, and states verbatim that it does not include operator or labor. That layer exists, it gets paid for, and it has no declared Catamarca supplier.

2

Installing fuel tanks and dispensing at the site, with remote metering. Tanks, dispensing, metering and on-site consumption control. It is the part of diesel that really is a service —trunk haulage is counted by the outbound logistics sheet— and it is where a small firm gets in without buying an engine. And since January 2026 there is a calendar framing it: a provincial resolution establishes a winter procedure from 1 May to 30 September each year —or earlier, if local conditions warrant it— whose stated purpose includes planning fuel storage to sustain operations through periods of isolation.

3

Batteries, which we did not identify as installed in Catamarca's puna. The installed fleet —600.30 kW at Antofagasta de la Sierra, 300 kW plus 600 kW of diesel backup at El Peñón, and the private plants— reports no storage in operation in the sources we reviewed unconf. The only ones planned are Tres Quebradas': its builder describes a photovoltaic park with more than 7 MW of storage for the salar and Fiambalá, contracted in 2022 and still «in preparation for start of construction» prob. And the precedent next door is already published: Lindero, in Salta, cuts an estimated 40 % of its diesel with 6 MWp and 12 MWh of batteries prob.

4

The two parks the province has still not built. The 2019 provincial plan had four parks for the Antofagasta department prob and two are done: Antofalla and La Ciénaga would be missing, and we did not find them built unconf. They would be paid for by the Salar del Hombre Muerto mining trust, which is a different buyer from the miner and with a different purchasing process.

What you needcapital, certification, tax regime and who pays
Energy's weight in site cash cost
30 % — USD 943 per tonne
Of those 943, how much is contractable
26 % of the bill; the rest is the diesel molecule
Operations still on diesel
2 of 4, and a third with no data
Installed batteries reported in Catamarca's puna
none identified in operation; Tres Quebradas', contracted in 2022, not built according to its contractor
▸ You tell us where to see what your company does and we tell you whether we see a sign that it fits this opportunity, with the evidence behind it. See if my company fits this opportunity →
When you get paid, and what blocks it
High and structural, because it is not discretionary spending: energy is 30 % of the site operating cost of a brine lithium mine —second after reagents and above labor, according to the cost table in Sal de Vida's technical report—. A plant down at an evaporation operation is lost production inside a process window that lasts months. That sustains availability retainers with penalties, which is the highest-margin contract form in the field. And there is a second payer almost nobody looks at: the Salar del Hombre Muerto mining trust, which already paid for the puna's two existing hybrid parks, Antofagasta de la Sierra prob and El Peñón, inaugurated in March 2021 prob prob, and whose 2019 plan added another two, at Antofalla and La Ciénaga, which we did not find built unconf.
Who you compete againstwho is already there and what share they take
Who is
already in
Market
split
The mining operator itself (Rio Tinto at Sal de Vida, Galan at Hombre Muerto Oeste)most of the operation

Today the power plant is a mine asset; no operator publishes who runs it. A third party running it is precisely the missing link: there is no generation, transmission or electrical maintenance layer sold as a service, even though it is the business's second-largest cost.

Equipment manufacturers and their official aftersales networkthe equipment and original spares

The genset, the turbine and the critical spare are imported, and the brand controls warranty service. That part is not contested: it is captive by design.

Contractor with a track record of hybrid generation built in the provincethe public microgrids

Awarded the El Peñón hybrid solar park —300 kW of photovoltaics and 600 kW of diesel backup—, with a tender budget of around USD 1.5 M in 2019 prob prob. It is the only contractor with a published track record of hybrid generation built in Catamarca's puna, and the buyer for that job was the mining trust, not an operator.

Energía de Catamarca (EC SAPEM)the puna's public grid

It is the provincial distributor and the owner of both hybrid parks, as well as the builder of the 33 kV line that connects the Puna to the provincial system. It does not compete for the mining contract: it is the customer on the public side and the one tendering the two parks still missing.

The jobs it createsThe niche has a measured, published externality worth stating because it is the sales argument: the Antofagasta de la Sierra solar park saves around USD 140,000 a year in diesel and transport, and the Salta precedent at Lindero estimates cutting 40 % of annual diesel and with it 10,630 tonnes of carbon dioxide.

the detail on jobs and trades
In a province where diesel arrives over gravel and above 4,000 meters, every liter not burned is also a truck that does not go up. On the social side, electrifying the puna also reaches the towns: the El Peñón park, inaugurated in March 2021, gives that town electricity 24 hours a day prob, and both existing installations were paid for by the Salar del Hombre Muerto mining trust — that is, lithium money financing the grid of the town that produces it.

How we
calculate it

The number is our own estimate. The calculation, step by step, is below.

The full calculation, step by step
NO WINDOW — perpetual opex. This niche does NOT spread a capex: it measures spending that runs every day for as long as the plant is running, just like the province's reagents and laboratory sheets. Its annual figure is NOT comparable with that of the Catamarca niches that divide over the canonical 2026-2029 window, nor with the two that divide over the extended 2026-2031 one, nor with the fiscal metering one, which divides over 4 years. The hybrid conversion block, which does have a window, is declared separately at the end and is NOT added to the headline figure.STEP 1 — WHO RUNS ON DIESEL, WHICH IS WHERE THIS NICHE IS DECIDED. It is not «Catamarca's puna»: it is two operations out of four: Fénix has already moved to gas, and how Tres Quebradas is powered today is not published.
OperationHow it is powered todayCounts
Fénix (Rio Tinto), 28,500 to 38,000 t a year of carbonate verif Resolución 431/2026natural gas through a dedicated 135 km pipeline from Salar de Pocitos verif Salta's state energy company, with backup diesel verif Rio Tinto annual report 2025, plus its own electrical system unconfNO
Tres Quebradas (Zijin-Liex), 20 to 40 ktpathe 132 kV, 50 km line between Tinogasta and Fiambalá, paid for with extra royalties from Zijin-Liex and able to power its Fiambalá plant, is under construction: it was over 60 % complete in September 2026 and is due to be finished in December prob El Ancasti with the provincial government's announcement; the salar's own electrical system, a photovoltaic park with more than 7 MW of storage contracted in 2022, is still described by its contractor as «in preparation for start of construction» prob the contractor's website; how the plant and the salar are powered today is not published unconfto be confirmed — not added: if its salar generates on site today, it is the largest diesel operation in the province and the niche grows thesis
Sal de Vida Stage 1 (Rio Tinto), 15 ktpaits own diesel generation; gas and solar declared «for later on» verif Rio Tinto annual report 2025YES
Hombre Muerto Oeste (Galan), 4 to 5.2 ktpa of LCE verif Galan quarterly report to June 2026diesel gensets; the feasibility study adds its own 3 MW solar park planned for 2026 and another 3 MW in 2030, and both fall within what the Phase 2 permit requests verif Galan feasibility study, October 2023YES
Kachi (Lake), pre-FIDthe supply study with YPF Luz concluded that the grid «is a viable solution»NO — declared upside, not added
STEP 2 — THE BREAKDOWN, WHICH IS WHERE THE FIGURE COMES FROM. Table 21-2 of Sal de Vida's technical report publishes the operating cost structure per tonne of carbonate: reagents 1,314 (42 %), energy 943 (30 %), labor 403 (13 %), consumables 268, general expenses 218, site cost 3,146, transport and port 133, FOB cost 3,279 = USD 148 M/yr. ⛔ And here there is a declared assumption, which is not papered over: the method uses USD 702 per tonne of fuel and USD 0.854 per liter of diesel delivered on site, and neither of the two figures appears in the technical report. The whole document was gone through —289 pages, the 707,000 characters of its text layer—: §21.3.2 (pages 242-243, read in full) on fuel says one single sentence, *«Diesel pricing estimates are based on current actuals»*, with no number; Table 21-2 has seven rows and none is fuel; and Figure 21-1, looked at rendered as an image in case the datum lived inside the chart, is a five-slice pie —reagents, labor, energy, general expenses and consumables— with no energy breakdown. ⇒ the subtraction 943 − 702 = 241 stands as arithmetic, but its second term is an assumption of ours, and that is how it reads, not as a figure from the report.The subtraction is the entire method: 943 minus 702 = USD 241 per tonne. That 26 % of the energy bill is the equipment, its operation and its maintenance. That is what gets contracted out to a third party; the other 702 is a purchase from the oil company.⭐ The document's two production levels do not contradict each other: they are stages. Table 21-2 publishes THREE column pairs, not one. Stage 1: USD 3,612 per tonne and USD 54 M a year ⇒ 15 thousand tonnes. Stage 2: USD 3,113 and USD 93 M ⇒ 30 thousand. Stages 1+2: USD 3,279 and USD 148 M ⇒ 45 thousand. They are the first stage, the second and the sum. The headline figure is calculated on intensity —dollars per tonne— so it does not depend on which of the three annual totals is taken. STEP 3 — THE CROSS-CHECK NOBODY WENT LOOKING FOR, AND IT CLOSES. At 702 dollars per tonne of fuel at 0.854 a liter you get 822 liters per tonne; at 0.28 liters per kWh [supuesto propio, specific consumption of a diesel genset at rated load] that is 2.94 MWh per tonne. So the 943 dollars of energy work out to USD 321 per MWh. The Hombre Muerto Norte technical report publishes USD 311 per MWh of Electricity Cost in its Table 21-11 for an isolated plant on the same salar, with the verbatim scope *«derived from the average fuel usage of a suitably sized diesel-generated power plant, factoring in the depreciation of the equipment over a seven-year period»*. Two independent technical documents, 3 % apart. And that second report's scope confirms this niche's boundary in writing: that figure does not include the plant's operator or labor, meaning the service layer sits on top of the 311, not inside it.STEP 4 — THE CALCULATION, WITH BOTH CUTS APPLIED.- Sal de Vida Stage 1: 15,000 t × USD 241/t = USD 3.62 M/yr at nameplate capacity. With a 60 to 100 % ramp (it achieved first production in the second quarter of 2026 and is still in commissioning verif Rio Tinto production report for the second quarter of 2026): USD 2.2 to 3.6 M/yr.- Hombre Muerto Oeste: 4,000 t of lithium equivalent at the same value per tonne = USD 0.96 M/yr at full intensity. But HMW does not crystallize carbonate: it produces chloride concentrate at 6 % lithium through nanofiltration and pond evaporation, a less energy-intensive process, so it gets 40 to 100 % of Sal de Vida's intensity, and the ramp on top: USD 0.23 to 0.96 M/yr.- The puna's two public microgrids: the Antofagasta de la Sierra park (600.30 kW of photovoltaics hybridized with backup diesel) and the El Peñón one (300 kW of photovoltaics plus 600 kW of diesel backup prob specialized press, inaugurated in March 2021 prob Noticias Positivas, 10-Mar-2021), both owned by Energía de Catamarca and financed by the mining trust. The service layer of those two installations runs to USD 0.1 to 0.3 M/yr estim propia, on declared capacity. The only published figure on their economics is the Antofagasta park's saving: ~USD 140,000 a year in diesel and transport.TOTAL: USD 2.5 to 4.9 M/yr, midpoint ~USD 3.7 M/yr.STEP 5 — THE CONTEXT THAT GIVES THE SCALE, AND IS NOT THE MARKET. The diesel molecule those two operations burn at nameplate capacity is around USD 13 M/yr (702 dollars per tonne over 19,000 tonnes). It is not in the headline figure because it is not a satellite supplier niche: it is a purchase from YPF or Shell with a distribution margin, and its trunk haulage is already counted by the outbound logistics niche. It is published so the proportion shows: for every contractable dollar there are three and a half of fuel, and that is the economic reason behind everything that follows.A SEPARATE BLOCK, WITH ITS OWN WINDOW — THE HYBRID CONVERSION. It is not added above because it is capex rather than opex, and because its date depends on an investment decision that has not been taken yet.- The buyer declared it in writing and then postponed it: Sal de Vida's 2022 technical report plans a 6 MW diesel plant and aims for *«30% of power generation for Stage 1 production»* to come *«from photovoltaic energy generated by a site-based solar farm»* verif 2022 technical report; Rio Tinto's 2025 annual report already says diesel, with gas and solar «considered at a later time» verif Rio Tinto annual report 2025.- The Argentine precedent exists, and it is in the puna next door: Lindero (Salta) is the first hybrid mine in the Argentine Puna — 6 MWp of photovoltaics plus 12 MWh of batteries, with an investment of close to USD 19 M according to the Salta government in March 2024 prob Salta government, and an estimated 40 % reduction in fuel a year prob specialized press; the annual saving in dollars is not published unconf; and in a single month, June 2025, it covered 26 % of demand and saved 286,300 liters of diesel verif Fortuna's second-quarter 2025 release.- And there is a gap no source fills: the solar capacity installed in Catamarca's puna reports no batteries unconf; the only ones planned are Tres Quebradas', more than 7 MW of storage for the salar and Fiambalá contracted in 2022 and still «in preparation for start of construction» prob the contractor's website. Added to that are the other two parks in the 2019 provincial plan, Antofalla and La Ciénaga prob El Ancasti, 27-Oct-2019, which we did not find built unconf.⚠️ NO TAM is put on this block and the reason is stated: the published investment in Lindero's solar plant, close to USD 19 M for 6 MWp, works out to some USD 3.2 M per MWp installed estim. And Sal de Vida's report does not say how many MW its solar plant would have, so there is nothing to spread that unit cost over. The gap is declared rather than filled in.

Concentration Concentration is high on the equipment side and low on the service side, and that asymmetry is the way in. The genset, the turbine and the original spare are controlled by the brand and are not contested. But operating and maintaining the plant on site —what the reference technical report itself excludes in writing from its energy cost, «without operator or labor»— has no declared Catamarca supplier. The province's mining services chamber carries renewable energy in its own name, and the supplier chamber's map of business lines does not register a single member in instrumentation and automation. The only contractor with hybrid work built in the puna is a single one, and its buyer was the mining trust, not an operator.

The rule that moves it

Here the rule does not create the demand —the mine needs electricity with or without a law— but it decides who can invoice it and who pays for the public part:

See the underlying reading

The underlying policy that opens up this demand. It is the same inference declared by the rules and the program pillars pushing in this direction.

the asset leaves demand that does not expire
enables
Re.P.E.M.: Catamarca's mining local-content rule is a resolution, not a law
See the rule →
The provincial supplier registry is the way into the mining contract: being registered makes the invoice count toward the minimum of 70 % of annual contracting that the operator has to do with registered suppliers.
See the full legal grounds
For this line of business the Catamarca payroll requirement is achievable —electricians and engine mechanics exist in the province and in the corridor's towns— but the registry does not grant what actually holds people back: on-site fuel storage and dispensing, which has its own permit, and high-altitude work certification for staff.
enables
Mining revenue does not go to the budget: it goes to a trust decided by a committee of three
See the rule →
It is the payer for the public half of this niche and almost nobody looks at it. The mining royalties fund financed the two hybrid parks that exist in the puna today —Antofagasta de la Sierra and El Peñón— and funds the medium-voltage line that will integrate the Puna into the provincial system, whose continuation the provincial government announced as contracted in March 2026, due to finish in the second half of 2027.
See the full legal grounds
The 2019 provincial plan added another two parks, Antofalla and La Ciénaga, which we did not find built. It is a public buyer: you get in through a tender rather than a quote to the operator, with a different payment timeline and different tender documents.

Where the number comes from

~USD 3.7 M/yr at the midpoint; the defensible band is USD 2.5-4.9 M/yr. It is small, and the reason is the finding: only two of the four operations have published diesel generation; Fénix moved to gas and how Tres Quebradas is powered is not published

See the calculation, the variables and how it was validated

The figure is built from three published variables and one subtraction. Change one and the total recalculates.

the tonnes of lithium produced by the two operations still on diesel, times the USD 241 per tonne that energy costs excluding fuel, with two cuts: chloride's lower intensity and the start-up ramp=~USD 3.7 M/yr at the midpoint; the defensible band is USD 2.5-4.9 M/yr
Energy per tonne of carbonateUSD 943 (30 % of site cash cost)annual review
Operating cost table from Sal de Vida's technical report. It is the business's second-largest expense, behind reagents (1,314) and ahead of all labor (403).
Fuel per tonneUSD 702 per tonne, with diesel at USD 0,854 a liter delivered on siteannual review
⚠️ Our own assumption, not a figure from the report. Neither of the two figures appears in the Sal de Vida technical report: its 289 pages, section 21.3.2 in full, Table 21-2 and Figure 21-1 inspected as an image were all reviewed. It is the second term of the subtraction that produces this page's figure, and it reads as an assumption for as long as no source turns up to support it.
The contractable part, which is the subtractionUSD 241 per tonne (26 % of the energy bill)annual review
The equipment, its operation and its maintenance. The Hombre Muerto Norte technical report confirms the boundary in writing: its energy cost does not include the plant's operator or labor.
Operations still on dieseltwo out of four, and a third with no datalive data
Sal de Vida Stage 1 and Hombre Muerto Oeste. Fénix runs on natural gas through a pipeline operated by REMSA, with backup diesel verif Rio Tinto annual report 2025. Tres Quebradas will have grid power at its Fiambalá plant once the 132 kV line from Tinogasta is finished prob El Ancasti with the provincial government's announcement, and how it is powered today is not published unconf. Kachi could be the next exit: its supply study has already concluded that the grid is viable.

The number rests on a few variables. The formula shows how it moves when each one changes; and each variable carries its freshness seal — how often it is worth revisiting. estim

How solid the number is estim

The figure does not come from counting generators, because nobody publishes the installed self-generation capacity of the private plants and the province's own research declares it as a gap. It comes from a subtraction that is published: Sal de Vida's technical report puts energy at USD 943 per tonne of carbonate and, in another paragraph of the same document, fuel at USD 702. The difference —USD 241 per tonne— is everything that is not the diesel molecule: the equipment, its operation and its maintenance. That is all we count. Then we apply two cuts: Hombre Muerto Oeste does not produce carbonate but chloride concentrate, a less energy-intensive process, and both operations are starting up, so they get a ramp-up. And there is a cross-check we were not looking for and it closed: along this route the energy cost works out to USD 321 per MWh, and a different technical report —the Hombre Muerto Norte one— publishes USD 311 per MWh for the same type of plant. Two independent documents, 3 % apart. What we deliberately leave out is the diesel itself: it is around USD 13 M a year, but it is a purchase from the oil company and not a supplier business. ⚠️ And about the fuel figure we say what we know: we reopened the whole Sal de Vida report on 1 September 2026 and that figure is not in the document, even though this page attributed it to it. The energy figure of USD 943 per tonne is in its Table 21-2 and we opened it with our own eyes; the USD 702 of fuel we subtract from it is, until its origin turns up, our own assumption and not a figure from the report.

Coverage: CAPPROMIN's trade map, the provincial chamber of mining suppliers (19 trades and 123 memberships, with a 2023 cut-off: three members in electrical services and no trade for instrumentation and automation), and the membership list of CASEMICA & ER, the sector's other chamber · Sep 14, 2026 · not reviewed: the Re.P.E.M., which is the mandatory provincial register, publishes the total number of registrants but never the names; and no operator publishes who holds the operation and maintenance contract for its power plant

How to cite this figure: Despegue (2026). Isolated power in Catamarca's puna: operating and maintaining the diesel plants and converting them to hybrid · Catamarca. despegueargentina.com/en/catamarca/energia-aislada-puna-diesel · terms of use

Neighbouring markets2 markets in the same group, from USD 10 to USD 101 M a year

First step · free
The first read of your company

We look at what your company does and tell you whether we see a sign that it fits this market, with the evidence behind it. If we do not see one, we say so too and name the condition that would change it. One page as a dated PDF, within 48 working hours.

Not here for a company? Invest · Work (in Spanish) · Start a business (in Spanish) · Institutions
Page 1 of the example executive summaryOpen the report ↗A real analysis · a real company, open in full →
Ignacio Aredez
Analysis and curation: Ignacio Aredez
Head of Despegue
Method and track record →
  • 20+ years in technology, 15 of them in data and AI, for clients across Europe and the Americas
  • Certified in AI governance (ISO/IEC 42001)
  • Machine Learning (Google Cloud)
  • Registered expert with the European Commission
How to read the seals →
  verif primary source · prob primary source pending · unconf a source said it · estim our own calculation · thesis our reading · the date belongs to the datum, at the precision its source allows
This is not financial advice. The TAM is an estimate with a transparent method, not an official figure; the framing is labeled as thesis. Every figure carries its source. ← All opportunities in Catamarca